USPTO serial 90773559
ROSE VIBRATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROSE VIBRATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Anhui Province, CN
Anhui Province, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW MORABITO
PO BOX 187EAST ROCHESTER, NY 14445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Condoms; Aerosol dispensers for medical use; Blood glucose meter; Body fat monitors; Contraceptive apparatus; Diaphragms for contraception; Love dolls; Masks for use by medical personnel; Massage apparatus and instruments; Sex dolls; Sex toys; Vibrating apparatus used to stimulate muscles and increase strength and physical performance for health and medical purposes; Adult sexual stimulation kit comprised primarily of sex toys and a printed workbook; Apparatus for vibrational therapy, namely, tuning forks; Bed vibrators; Electrically-powered apparatus for treating skin by applying low level light and sonic vibrations to the skin; Inflatable life-sized dolls used in sexual activity | ABANDONED | May 24, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |