Drawing for SPEKTRUM+

USPTO serial 90775245

SPEKTRUM+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEKTRUM+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Myers

Nicholas D. Myers THE MYERS LAW GROUP4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 200Newport Beach, CA 92660United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Circuit boards for sirens and public address systems; Computer circuit boards for sirens and public address systems; Electric cables for sirens and public address systems; Electric cables and wires for sirens and public address systems; Electrical circuit boards for sirens and public address systems; Electrical interconnect cables for sirens and public address systems; Electrical and optical cables for sirens and public address systems; Flexible circuit boards for sirens and public address systems; Flexible PVC covering specially adapted for electrical cords that is infused with citrus to prevent pet damage for sirens and public address systems; Mounting devices for monitors; Plastic covered electric wires for sirens and public address systems; Power supplies for sirens and public address systems; Rubber covered electrical wires for sirens and public address systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 14, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 3, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 5, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 5, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 6, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 6, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 6, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 11, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 9, 2023XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 9, 2023GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2023GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2023CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 2, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 28, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 31, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 29, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 28, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 2, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 18, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance