Drawing for SUNFIT

USPTO serial 90775448

SUNFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOLFSEN, CHRISTIANNE LISBETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MOLLY HUNSINGER

Molly Hunsinger Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan Ave., Ste. 1600Chicago, IL 60604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Handbags; make-up bags sold empty; tote bags; travel bags; fanny packs; backpacks; athletic bags; duffel bags; reusable shopping bags; sports bagsACTIVE—
021Vacuum bottles; thermal insulated containers for food or beverage; mugs; shaker bottles sold empty; sports bottles sold emptyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 22, 2024EXDREXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED REMANDED—
Sep 15, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 5, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 5, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 5, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jun 5, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 3, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Nov 21, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 7, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance