USPTO serial 90776425
EXPOTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'NEILL, MARY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPOTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JASON R FULMER
JASON R FULMER FOLEY & LARDNER LLP2021 MCKINNEY AVE SUITE 1600DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorship services featuring electronic components; distributorship services featuring semiconductors; distributorship services featuring electronic components, semiconductors; Catalog ordering service featuring electronic components; Catalog ordering service featuring semiconductors; Electronic catalog services featuring electronic components; Electronic catalog services featuring semiconductors; Online wholesale and retail store services featuring electronic components provided by means of a general merchandise website on the global or local telecommunications network; Online wholesale and retail store services featuring semiconductors provided by means of a general merchandise website on the global or local telecommunications network; wholesale and retail store services featuring electronic components provided by means of mail order catalogs; wholesale and retail store services featuring electronic components provided by means of telephone, facsimile, and mail order; wholesale and retail store services featuring semiconductors provided by means of mail order catalogs; wholesale and retail store services featuring semiconductors provided by means of telephone, facsimile, and mail order; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, namely, electronic components, excluding the transport thereof, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods by means of on-line retail stores, and from a general merchandise catalog by mail order, telephone order, and facsimile order; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of semiconductors, excluding the transport thereof, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods by means of on-line retail stores, and from a general merchandise catalog by mail order, telephone order, and facsimile order; all of the foregoing electronic components, semiconductors for use in the manufacture of finished goods; none of the foregoing related to petrochemical testing instruments and processing equipment, laboratory instruments, reagents, laboratory and bulk chemicals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 28, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 27, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | PAPER RECEIVED AT TTAB | — | |
| Jun 27, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 30, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |