USPTO serial 90776459
XTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'NEILL, MARY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason R. Fulmer
Jason R. Fulmer FOLEY & LARDNER LLP2021 MCKINNEY AVE., SUITE 1600DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorship services in the field of electronics and electronic components; distributorship services in the field of semiconductors; distributorship services featuring electronic components, semiconductors; Catalog ordering service featuring electronic components; Catalog ordering service featuring semiconductors; Electronic catalog services featuring electronic components; Electronic catalog services featuring semiconductors; Online wholesale and retail store services featuring electronic components provided by means of a general merchandise website on the global or local telecommunications network; Online wholesale and retail store services featuring semiconductors provided by means of a general merchandise website on the global or local telecommunications network; wholesale and retail store services featuring electronic components provided by means of mail order catalogs; wholesale and retail store services featuring electronic components provided by means of telephone, facsimile, and mail order; wholesale and retail store services featuring semiconductors provided by means of mail order catalogs; wholesale and retail store services featuring semiconductors provided by means of telephone, facsimile, and mail order; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, namely, electronic components, excluding the transport thereof, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods by means of on-line retail stores, and from a general merchandise catalog by mail order, telephone order, and facsimile order; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of semiconductors, excluding the transport thereof, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods by means of on-line retail stores, and from a general merchandise catalog by mail order, telephone order, and facsimile order | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product design and development in the field of electronic components; design of electronic components and consulting related thereto; design and testing of electronic components; technical consultation in the field of product design and development of electronics and electronic components; design for others in the field of electronics, electronic components; technical support services, namely, providing technical advice in the field of product design and development of electronics components, and design of electronic components; providing technical advice in the field of electronic components design; providing technical support, namely, monitoring technological functions of electronic semiconductors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mouser Electronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mouser Electronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XTECH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |