USPTO serial 90777238
HYPE HYPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYPE HYPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Birmingham, GB
Wigston Leicestershire, GB
Birmingham, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RHETT V. BARNEY
RHETT V. BARNEY LEE & HAYES PC601 W. RIVERSIDE AVE. SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | pencil cases | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER, AND GOODS MADE OF THESE MATERIALS, NAMELY, BACKPACKS, SATCHELS, HANDBAGS, WALLETS, PURSES; HANDBAGS; BAGS FOR SPORTS; SHOULDER BAGS; KIT BAGS; DRAWSTRING BAGS; GYM BAGS; BEACH BAGS; CROSSBODY BAGS; BUM BAGS; TOTE BAGS; PURSES; WALLETS; TRUNKS AND TRAVELLING BAGS; LUGGAGE; SUITCASES; CREDIT CARD HOLDERS; LUGGAGE TAGS; GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL; TRAVELLING SETS COMPRISED OF SUITCASES AND LUGGAGE; DOCUMENT CASES AND FOLDERS, NAMELY, BRIEFCASES-TYPE LEATHER BUSINESS FOLDERS; SUIT BAGS; RUCKSACKS; BACKPACKS; BEAUTY CASES, NAMELY, COSMETIC CASES AND VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY; UMBRELLAS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2024 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |