USPTO serial 90778180
ROLLAND HIBULK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, CHARLES FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROLLAND HIBULK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Jerome, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Mikulina
Jennifer M. Mikulina MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP444 WEST LAKE STREET, SUITE 4000CHICAGO, IL 60606-0029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, writing and printing paper; fine paper; fine paper, namely, paper used in the printing and the graphic arts industry; fine paper, namely, uncoated paper used in retail market and commercial printing and reprographing market; stationery paper; fine paper used in the book publishing segment; uncoated fine paper; photocopier paper; papers of all kinds, namely, packaging papers, fancy papers, decorative papers, industrial papers, business papers being semi-finished business card paper, converting papers being used to fabricate envelopes and paper bags; and Specialty papers, namely, vegetable parchment, for use in food wrapping, preparation, processing and packaging applications; all purpose fine paper; surface treated fine paper, namely, Treated paper for wrapping flowers and floral arrangements; ledger paper; text and cover paper; recycled fine kraft paper for commercial use; recycled fine paper for commercial use; recycled cellulose fiber paper without fluorescence being cellulose wipes; recycled reprographic paper; recycled coated paper; fragrance paper with embedded scent for use in the print industry; non-commercial paper with one or more overt security features; envelopes; packaging and containers comprised of cellulose fiber for molded packaging applications and food service packaging; bathroom tissue, facial tissue | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |