USPTO serial 90779587
CREDIT CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CREDIT CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott M. Sisun, Esq.
Scott M. Sisun, Esq. Sisun Law135 Madison Avenue, Floor 5New York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence for CREDIT APPLICATIONS; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence for CREDIT EVALUATIONS; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence for CONSUMER LENDING; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence for INVESTMENT ADVISORS; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence for ALTERNATIVE CREDIT; Computer modeling services; Computer programming consultancy; Computer services, namely, integration of computer software into multiple systems and networks; Computer software consulting; Computer software design and updating; Computer software development; Computer software development in the field of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTMENT; Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTMENT; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Creating, maintaining, and modernizing computer software; Data security consultancy; Design and development of computer software for ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTMENT; Design and testing of new products for others; Developing and updating computer software; Innovation consulting services, namely, advising others in the areas of product development; Providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; Research, development, design and upgrading of computer software; Writing and updating computer software | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2022 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |