Drawing for MUVE

USPTO serial 90783352

MUVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DONEGAN, DANIEL P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Cislo, Esq.

Daniel M. Cislo, Esq. Cislo & Thomas LLP12100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1700Los Angeles, CA 90025-7103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Animal-free protein milk; fermented animal-free milk; animal-free milk comprised of milk protein components produced through microbial fermentation for use as a cow's milk and dairy product alternative; animal-free cheese substitutes; animal-free cheese made from milk protein components produced through microbial fermentation; animal-free yogurts; animal-free milk substitutes; animal-free milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurtACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 11, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2021WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2021WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance