USPTO serial 90784398
OCIUSNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OCIUSNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shau Kei Wan, HK
Shau Kei Wan, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RYAN A. BETHELL
RYAN A. BETHELL THE IDEAS LAW FIRM, PLLC975 E DAVA DRIVETEMPE, AZ 85283UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business administration; Business administration and management; Business administration services; Business advisory and consultancy services; Business management; Business management assistance for industrial or commercial companies; Business management assistance; Business administration assistance | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Architectural design services; Architectural services for the design of industrial buildings; Architectural services for the design of commercial buildings; Computer aided design for manufacturing operations; Computer-aided design of video graphics; Computer aided design services relating to building projects; Computer aided design services; Computer-aided engineering design and drawing services; Computer-aided engineering design services; Computer aided graphic design; Computer system design; Consultancy in the field of technological design, namely, architecture, engineering, fiber optics, Internet, electronic networks, micro-trenching, construction, traffic control plans, electrical layouts, interior lighting, and cabling | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |