USPTO serial 90790459
SOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERR, JENNA FRANCES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cottonwood Heights, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
Peter M. de Jonge THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, LLP8180 SOUTH 700 EAST, SUITE 350SANDY, UT 84070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Baby and children's clothing, namely, sleepwear, sleepsuits, pajamas, one-piece garments for infants and toddlers, swimsuits, swimwear, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, shirts, pants, rompers, overalls, shorts, headwear, cloth bibs, hats, dresses, swaddling clothes; the aforementioned specifically excluding clothing in sizes larger than US 7-8 | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |