USPTO serial 90791453
JULIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JULIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina S. Loza
Christina S. Loza LOZA & LOZA, LLP305 North 2nd Avenue #127Upland, CA 91786United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, web-based personalized tutorial sessions in various academic disciplines using artificial intelligence at the undergraduate, graduate, vocational and professional development levels; educational services, namely, providing web-based personalized tutorial sessions utilizing artificial intelligence in various scholastic disciplines at the undergraduate, graduate, vocational and professional development levels, which enable academic learning mastery through providing student-specific educational and teaching activities which identify learning gaps and curate the activities to fill those gaps for students to master a particular academic topic | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in enabling academic learning mastery for students at the undergraduate, graduate, vocational and professional development levels through providing educational and teaching activities in which, based on the response from students during such activities, the service can identify learning gaps and curate the activities to fill those gaps for students to master a particular academic topic; online educational assessment; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence to automatically generate educational activities for students, validate the responses provided by students as part of the activity, and provide feedback; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software with artificial intelligence for use in enabling academic learning mastery for students at the undergraduate, graduate, vocational and professional development levels through providing educational and teaching activities in which, based on the response from students during such activities, the service can identify learning gaps and curate the activities to fill those gaps for students to master a particular scholastic topic; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software with artificial intelligence for personalized learning by providing students with educational activities in various academic disciplines at the undergraduate, graduate, vocational and professional development levels; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software that uses artificial intelligence for tutoring and to automatically generate educational activities for students, validate the responses provided by students as part of the activity, and provide feedback | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |