USPTO serial 90792323
IBIS ACCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2025
- Examiner
- AURAND, MEGAN LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with IBIS ACCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.
Montreal, QC, CA
Other trademarks owned by ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.
ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.
Montreal, QC, CA
Other trademarks owned by ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.
ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.
Montreal, QC, CA
Other trademarks owned by ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason Sanders
Jason Sanders Sanders IP Law140 West Union Avenue, # 205Farmington, UT 84025United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Hardware as a service (HaaS) used for ballistic identification, for automated cartridge case digital imaging station in the nature of rental of photography drones, drones for topography capture for the capture of high-resolution 2D images and 3D topographic information of significant regions of interest found on fired cartridge cases; hardware as a service (HaaS) used for automated bullet digital imaging station in the nature of rental of photography drones, drones for topography capture for the capture of high-resolution 2D images and 3D topographic information of a fired bullet's lands and grooves | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Hardware as a service (HaaS) used for ballistic identification, for automated cartridge case digital imaging station in the nature of rental of photographic equipment for topography capture for the capture of high-resolution 2D images and 3D topographic information of significant regions of interest found on fired cartridge cases; hardware as a service (HaaS) used for automated bullet digital imaging station in the nature of photographic equipment for the capture of high-resolution 2D images and 3D topographic information of a fired bullet's lands and grooves | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hardware as a service (HaaS) used for ballistic identification, for automated cartridge case digital imaging station in the nature of rental of computer hardware and computer software for the capture of high-resolution 2D images and 3D topographic information of significant regions of interest found on fired cartridge cases; Hardware as a service (HaaS) used for automated bullet digital imaging station in the nature of rental of computer hardware and computer software for the capture of high-resolution 2D images and 3D topographic information of a fired bullet's lands and grooves; Hardware as a service (HaaS) used for comparative analysis station in the nature of rental of computer hardware, and computer software for reviewing correlation results and for virtual microscopy based on 2D images and 3D topography of fired cartridge cases and bullets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ULTRA ELECTRONICS FORENSIC TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IBIS ACCESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2025 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |