USPTO serial 90792363
VRML
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, LAURA KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VRML?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Quebec, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia K. Sutherland
Julia K. Sutherland SEYFARTH SHAW LLP233 S. WACKER DRIVESUITE 8000CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications, namely, newsletters in the field of e-sports | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Internet-based e-sports exhibition, competition and tournament subscriptions services in the nature of subscription television broadcasting | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing augmented reality video game exhibitions via a website; sporting activities, namely, arranging and conducting augmented reality video game competitions and tournaments; providing on-line electronic publications, namely, newsletters in the field of e-sports; recording and production of videos in the field of e-sports; internet-based e-sports exhibition, competition and tournament subscriptions services in the nature of ticket reservation and booking services for live events in the field of e-sports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |