USPTO serial 90793848
COUNT OLAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUNT OLAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J Strauss
Stephen J Strauss BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-1730United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TOPS AS CLOTHING, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, HOODED SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, SHORTS, JACKETS, COATS, SWEATERS, SLEEPWEAR, PAJAMAS, ROMPERS, ONE-PIECE GARMENTS AND JUMPERS FOR CHILDREN AND INFANTS, BEACHWEAR, BELTS, BOTTOMS AS CLOTHING, CLOTH BIBS, VESTS, COSTUMES FOR USE IN ROLE-PLAYING GAMES, BEACH COVER-UPS, DRESSES, EAR MUFFS, GOWNS, GLOVES, HALLOWEEN COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, MASQUERADE COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, SKI MASKS, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, HOSIERY, LEGGINGS, JEGGINGS, INFANTWEAR, INFANT WEARABLE BLANKETS; LEOTARDS, LINGERIE, LOUNGEWEAR, MITTENS, OVERALLS, PANTS, PONCHOS, RAINWEAR, RAINCOATS, SCARVES, SOCKS, SUITS, SWIMWEAR, BATHING SUITS, WATERSKIING SUITS; TIES, UNDERWEAR, BRAS, WRIST BANDS, NECKERCHIEFS; NECKTIES, BOW TIES; HEADWEAR AND FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2024 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2024 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |