USPTO serial 90796750
GURKHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GURKHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LABA KARKI
LABA KARKI LAW OFFICE OF DR. KARKI P.C.7507 LISLE AVENUEFALLS CHURCH, VA 22043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 22, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 22, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ISMR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |