USPTO serial 90797402
FLYR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLYR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne Boisineau
Lynne Boisineau Boisineau Law, P.C.16478 Beach Blvd., Suite 347Westminster, CA 92683United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services in the field of price optimization available electronically via computer networks, global information networks and wireless networks; business consultation services in the field of price optimization for hotels, travel, travel planning and ground products | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online, non-downloadable software used to transmit data relating to rates, availability, and reservations for flights, hotels, resorts and other providers of temporary accommodation services; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for the integration of transportation, travel, tourism and temporary lodging and accommodation rate, availability and booking information into websites; designing and developing websites and mobile software applications of others in the fields of transportation, travel, tourism and temporary lodging and accommodations; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and websites of others in the fields of transportation, travel, tourism and temporary lodging and accommodations; design and development of computer software; development of computer programs; development of computer platforms for the travel industry; development of application programming interface (API) software; development of computer platforms for Internet applications; programming of computer software of others for Internet platforms and for e-commerce platforms; providing a web hosting platform for price optimization for airlines, hotels, travel packages, cruises, travel tickets, car rental, tours and entertainment activities for travelers; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software used for price optimization for airlines, hotels, travel packages, cruises, tours, travel tickets, car rental, and entertainment activities for travelers; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms used for price optimization for airlines, hotels, travel packages, cruises, travel tickets, car rental, tours and entertainment activities for travelers; computer software installation and maintenance services; design and development of computer software for airlines; the provision of information and consultancy services relating to the foregoing services; the provision of the foregoing services and information relating thereto online via computer software applications, computer databases, the Internet, or via any other communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2024 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2024 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2023 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2023 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |