USPTO serial 90798221
BEYOND BIOSECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEYOND BIOSECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Iowa City, IA
Iowa City, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Proskey
Christopher A. Proskey BROWNWINICK LAW FIRM666 GRAND AVE., SUITE 2000DES MOINES, IA 50309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Cleaning preparations for eliminating bacteria and microorganisms from surfaces; Cleaning preparations for eliminating bacteria and microorganisms from surfaces for use in industrial applications; Cleaning preparations for eliminating bacteria and microorganisms from surfaces for use in agricultural applications; Cleaning preparations for eliminating bacteria and microorganisms from surfaces for use in animal rearing operations; Cleaning preparations for eliminating bacteria and microorganisms from surfaces for use with animal husbandry operations; Biotechnological cleaning preparations for eliminating bacteria and microorganisms from surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Air purification devices in the nature of air purifiers for eliminating airborne and surface viruses, bacteria, mold, fungi, allergens, and volatile organic compounds; Air purification filters for industrial use; and air purification filters for domestic use; Water purification systems comprised of water purifying machines; Water purification apparatus for converting water into disinfecting solutions; Air purification systems comprised of air purifiers; Air purification units; Air purification apparatuses; Water purification units; Water purification apparatuses and installations; Water purification filters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |