Drawing for SYMPHONY

USPTO serial 90803856

SYMPHONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRIZANT, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYMPHONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas M Dunlap

Thomas M Dunlap Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC211 Church Street, SELeesburg, VA 20175United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing a website featuring resources, namely, a website featuring primarily non-downloadable software for personnel recruiting, posting job openings online, screening and interviewing job applicants online, and storing resumes online and also featuring non-downloadable publications in the nature of blog postings and web articles in the field of recruiting and employmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 13, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 28, 2022ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 27, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance