USPTO serial 90810038
ELECTRIC GOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNING, KATHRYN ELISABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELECTRIC GOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas O'Rourke
Thomas O'Rourke BODNER & O'ROURKE425 BROADHOLLOW ROAD, SUITE 120MELVILLE, NY 11747United StatesGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |