Drawing for EPIVISION

USPTO serial 90815700

EPIVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPIVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julianne Abelman

Julianne Abelman Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance consultancy; mutual funds investment; investment of funds; Management of capital investment funds; Private equity fund investment services; Mutual fund advisory services; Charitable Fund Investment, namely, investment of funds for charitable purposes; financial analysis; financial management; art appraisal; real estate brokerage; financial customs brokerage services; financial guarantees; charitable fund raising; trusteeship representatives; lending against security, namely, securities lendingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 13, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 13, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 13, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 11, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 11, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Jul 20, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 10, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance