USPTO serial 90820244
ECSEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECSEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel C. Neustadt
Daniel C. Neustadt HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP800 17TH STREET NW, SUITE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable multimedia files containing content in the field of pedagogy and the development of emotional competence and intelligence; downloadable activity guides in the field of pedagogy and the development of emotional competence and intelligence; downloadable animated videos in the field of pedagogy and the development of emotional competence and intelligence; downloadable and recorded ebooks in the field of pedagogy and the development of emotional competence and intelligence; downloadable educational publications, namely lesson plans in the field of pedagogy and the development of emotional competence and intelligence; downloadable and recorded educational video games and computer, mobile, and tablet application software in the field of pedagogy and the development of emotional competence and intelligence; digital classroom tools, namely, downloadable and recorded software for use in teaching and instruction on development of emotional competence and intelligence in classrooms; Decorative magnets for use by children as toys; Decorative magnets for use by children as educational toys; classroom tools, namely, magnets; | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2024 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |