Drawing for SMART OCCUPANCY

USPTO serial 90825986

SMART OCCUPANCY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART OCCUPANCY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd A. Benni

Todd A. Benni MCDONALD HOPKINS LLC600 SUPERIOR AVENUE, EAST, SUITE 2100CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Measuring, detecting, monitoring and controlling devices, namely, network and computer servers; sensors, detectors and monitoring instruments, namely, people counting sensors; safety, security, protection, and signaling devices, namely, peripheral devices for use in controlling access, lighting, and sound alerts; information technology and audio-visual, multimedia and photographic devices, namely, digital signage displays for use in displaying occupancy information and other content; occupancy sensors, namely, electronic devices which detect the presence of occupants; proximity sensors; counting sensorsACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for remote maintenance service, data collection, trend analyses, and security and occupancy compliance checks; systems for continuous monitoring, detection, and signaling, namely, a business intelligence cloud based software platform for use in retail securityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 11, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 10, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 29, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 26, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 20, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 8, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 7, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 18, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 18, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 31, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 31, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance