USPTO serial 90826244
HABIT CHANGE PROVIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HABIT CHANGE PROVIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Robyn S. Lederman BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software application for biometric screening, review of claims data, online risk screening, and virtual coaching services, namely in the fields of wellness, behavior modification, and metabolic disease prevention | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software for use I the field of healthcare services, namely, software for providing technology-enabled virtual health and training, coaching services in nutrition, exercise, genetics and behavioural science focused on assessing, preventing, reversing and showing the progression of disease while enriching mental health, resilience and human performance Advisory and consultancy services pertaining to software in the field of health and training, and coaching in nutrition, exercise, genetics and behavioural science focused on assessing, preventing, reversing and showing the progression of disease while enriching mental health resilience and human performance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |