USPTO serial 90826514
THERMALTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, CHARLES FREDERICK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THERMALTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hallstahammar, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Kevlin, Esq.
Mary L. Kevlin, Esq. COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 WEST 47 STREET, 21 FLOORNEW YOR, NY 10036-1525United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric heating equipment, namely high temperature furnaces, kilns and heating elements; heating systems composed primarily of metallic or ceramic heating elements and process tubes and muffles in which a wide variety of items are heated to high temperatures for purposes of holding melt at temperature, transferring heat across surface areas, and melting of non-ferrous metals, namely, aluminum, magnesium, brass, tin, and sintering, thermal de-binding, high temperature firing, thermal cycling, calcining, raising the temperature of materials through slow rotation, and heating of glass and plastics, namely, rapid heating, optical fiber drawing, glass annealing, and melting; furnaces; heating elements and metallic heating elements; heating installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair, rebuild, maintenance and installation of electric heating equipment, heating systems, furnaces, heating elements, metallic heating elements and heating installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2024 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |