Drawing for SMART PLANNER

USPTO serial 90827167

SMART PLANNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SMART PLANNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tom P. Papuga

Tom P. Papuga BOISBRUN HOFMAN, PLLC1255 WEST 15TH STREET, SUITE 400PLANO, TX 75075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services in the field of oil and gas, namely, providing technology information relating to planning and modeling of downhole wireline conveyance operations, including jarring, fishing, and pump-down operations; computer modeling services in the field of oil and gas, namely, modeling downhole conditions for planning downhole wireline conveyance operations, including jarring, fishing, and pump-down operations; and computer modeling services in the field of oil and gas, namely, modeling downhole wireline conveyance operations, including jarring, fishing, and pump-down operationsACTIVEMay 10, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 23, 2023MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 23, 2023MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 23, 2023ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 18, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2023PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2023APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 5, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 21, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance