USPTO serial 90830849
MOONLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BETTS, MARCYA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOONLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Herman
JEFFREY HERMAN LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY HERMAN, PLC7272 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD, SUITE 540SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated herbal body care products, namely, lotions containing hemp extract derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, topical creams containing hemp extract derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, essential oils containing hemp extract derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Aromatherapy sprays comprised of essential oils for use on skin, containing hemp extract derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Aromatic preparations, namely, fragrances containing hemp extract derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Breath freshening sprays; Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care; Essential oils for food flavorings; Essential oils for pain relief, containing hemp extract derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Essential oils for muscle relaxation, containing hemp extract derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Essential oils for ingesting, containing hemp extract derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Inhalers sold filled with essential oils for use in aromatherapy; Non-medicated skin care preparation, namely, body mist; Reed diffusers comprised of scented oils and also including reeds and a diffuser container | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Aerosol dispensers not for medical use; Electric essential oil diffusers; Electric aromatherapy oil diffusers; Non-electric aromatic oil diffusers, other than reed diffusers; Plug-in diffusers for aromatic oils; Ultrasonic essential oil diffusers; Vaporizers being electric aromatic oil diffusers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |