USPTO serial 90831709
SUBLIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, TARYN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUBLIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard H Newman
Richard H Newman NEWMAN LAW, LLC7435 S EASTERN AVE, SUITE 105-431LAS VEGAS, NV 89123United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Gaming machines; Gaming machines featuring preinstalled software for accepting wagers; Gaming machines that generate or display wager outcomes; Gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; Machines for playing games of chance; Slot machines; Electronic gaming machines, namely, devices which accept a wager; Gaming machines, namely, electronic slot and bingo machines; Preinstalled software for accepting wagers sold as a component of gaming machines; Reconfigurable casino and lottery gaming equipment, namely, gaming machines and recorded operational computer game software therefor sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |