USPTO serial 90832336
QU.SBEARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 692
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN,KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QU.SBEARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chizhou City,Anhui, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Birdcages; Autoclaves, non electric, for cooking; Bait stations sold empty for feeding rodenticides to rodents; Bird feeders; Electric devices for attracting and killing insects; Fly catchers; Fly swatters; Indoor terrariums for animals or insects; Insect collecting cages; Insect traps; Mouse traps; Plug-in diffusers for mosquito repellents; Rat traps; Rings for identifying birds; Terrariums for animals or insects; Ultrasonic pest repellers | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2024 | CRAF | AMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |