USPTO serial 90832733
INSTAKICK$
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTAKICK$?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW JACOBS
MATTHEW JACOBS THE LAW OFFICE OF MATT JANDA4939 MAYTIME LANECULVER CITY, CA 90230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and recorded computer software for retail inventory management, sold as a unit; Computer software platforms, downloadable, for payment processing in connection with the sale of goods; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for payment processing in connection with the sale of goods; Downloadable computer application software for sale of goods, namely, software for payment processing in connection with the sale of goods; Downloadable computer software for wireless content delivery; Downloadable computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage, and sharing of data and information; Downloadable computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |