Drawing for AIROS CARING FOR THOSE WHO PROVIDE CARE

USPTO serial 90840364

AIROS CARING FOR THOSE WHO PROVIDE CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OAKES, JEFFREY ALLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIROS CARING FOR THOSE WHO PROVIDE CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES KLOBUCAR

James Klobucar GEARHART LAW, LLC41 RIVER ROADSUMMIT, NJ 07901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Information technology (IT) consulting services; computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; information technology (IT) services for healthcare systems, namely, information technology consulting services, virtual desktops, managed networks, access management, application hosting, and project management; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology systems of others; technical consulting services, migration as a technical support service in the nature of migration of datacenter, server and database applications, and infrastructure management services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; managed service provider services, namely, network services being computer services in the nature of network analysis, LAN/WAN design, wireless engineering, virtualization and computer project management and the integration of computer software into multiple systems and networks, application services being technical support services in the nature of 24/7 monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts, infrastructure services being infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting servers for use by others, and computer security services, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities for computingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 2, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 31, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 31, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 31, 2023EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
May 26, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 26, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 26, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 9, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 9, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 8, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 8, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 8, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 8, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 6, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 6, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2021MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance