Drawing for CHRYSALIS

USPTO serial 90843304

CHRYSALIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNING, KATHRYN ELISABETH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHRYSALIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Bondi

Michael A. Bondi Spencer Fane LLP100 South Fifth Street, Suite 2500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Holding company services, namely, provision of investment capital, financial reporting and financial advising to subsidiaries and affiliated companies operating in the field of provision of software products and software-as-a-service business applications and related payment processing servicesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for business management, namely, inventory management, tracking usage and price data, point-of-sale processing, management of general ledger, order entry, management of purchasing and receiving records, customer records, document management, sales information, financial management, supply chain management, integration and management of sales records, management of billing and customer accounts, management of HR data, management of vendor payments, management of accounts payable, management of accounts receivable, data and sales reporting and analytics, business intelligence, and management of electronic commerce; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for content management for use in the remote or local scheduling, maintenance and display of electronic advertising and other multimedia content on in-store electronic display interfaces, for retail or point-of-sale applications and on fixed or mobile devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 5, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 3, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 28, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2025GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2025GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2025CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 30, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 14, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 14, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2024ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2024GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2024GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2024CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2023GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2023GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2023CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 2, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 29, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 27, 2021TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Oct 27, 2021PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance