Drawing for ZERKO

USPTO serial 90848332

ZERKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZERKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin Johanson

Justin Johanson JOHANSON PARKER21920 E. PEGASUS PARKWAYQUEEN CREEK, AZ 85142UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of e-sports gaming; Educational services, namely, conducting online exhibitions in the field of live online video game tournament; Entertainment in the nature of e-sports games; Entertainment information; Entertainment services in the nature of hosting social entertainment events; Arranging and conducting e-sports competitions; Entertainment in the nature of e-sports competitions; Entertainment services, namely, providing online multiplayer video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game; Organization of e-sports competitions; Providing non-downloadable videos in the field of e-sports gaming via a website; Providing non-downloadable videos in the field of online gaming via a website; Providing on-line computer games; Providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of e-sports gaming; Providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of online gaming; Providing a web-based system and on-line portal for customers to participate in on-line gaming, operation and coordination of game tournaments, leagues and tours for recreational computer game playing purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2023NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
Jul 13, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 13, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 12, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 12, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2023IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Aug 2, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 27, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2022ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 27, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2022RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Apr 20, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance