USPTO serial 90853055
DEA DEVELOPING THE EVOLUTION OF AIRLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, CLINTON J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEA DEVELOPING THE EVOLUTION OF AIRLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond Hill, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE PASQUALONE MUTINO, ESQ.
LESLIE PASQUALONE MUTINO, ESQ. REINHARDT LLP200 LIBERTY STREET, 27TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10281UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal bottle caps; Non-metal caps for bottles; Non-metallic bottle caps; Non-metallic sealing caps; Non-metallic and non-paper closures and caps for cartons, containers, and bottles; Packaging containers of plastic; Plastic caps; Plastic stoppers for bottles; Screw tops, not of metal, for bottles; Sealing caps, not of metal; Stoppers for bottles, not of glass, metal or rubber | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Flasks; Applicator wands for applying make-up; Applicators sold empty for applying cosmetic lotions for skin; Bottles for pharmaceuticals sold empty; Bottles, sold empty; Compacts sold empty; Cosmetic brushes; Cosmetic spatulas; Droppers sold empty for cosmetic purposes; Droppers for cosmetic purposes; Empty spray bottles; Glass jars; Lotion containers sold empty for domestic use; Make-up compacts sold empty; Manually actuated pump dispensers for attachment to containers for use in dispensing liquids; Perfume bottles sold empty; Powder compacts; Powder compacts sold empty; Powder compacts, empty; Roller bottles, sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |