USPTO serial 90853365
E EVIDENCE BASED ADVISORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, TRAVIS WILLIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E EVIDENCE BASED ADVISORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAMILLE M. MILLER
CAMILLE M. MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR1650 MARKET STREETSUITE 2800PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial asset management; financial investment services in the field of turnkey asset management; financial investment services, namely, financial investment brokerage, financial investment analysis, investment management; financial advisory services; financial and administrative services, namely, financial consultation, financial analysis, financial trust administration; financial services, namely, administration of transactions involving funds drawn from securities, stocks, funds, equities, bonds, cash, or other types of financial investments; financial planning, advisory, and management services; financial portfolio analysis services; financial portfolio management; asset management, namely, cash management, investment management, financial risk management, capital investment consulting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |