USPTO serial 90857291
STICKY SITUATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIURPITA, DREW PETER FISHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STICKY SITUATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hamilton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Thomas
JOHN H. THOMAS JOHN H. THOMAS, P.C.536 GRANITE AVENUERICHMOND, VA 23226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Grease removers for household purposes; adhesive removers; resin removers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |