USPTO serial 90861357
FOXIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, LAURA KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOXIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James (Jingming) Cai
James (Jingming) Cai SAC ATTORNEYS LLP1754 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 122SAN JOSE, CA 95110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software, namely, software for creating, reading, editing, managing, printing, indexing and retrieving electronic documents and files; downloadable document digitization software for use with optical scanners; downloadable software for page recognition and rendering; downloadable document management software for mobile devices; downloadable computer software development tools; downloadable software for use on computers and mobile devices for accessing, viewing and controlling remote computers and devices; downloadable computer software for the transmission, reception, coding or decoding of voice, data or multimedia content; downloadable computer software to allow remote access to, monitoring of, or control of, computer hardware, computer software, electronic documents, or electronic communications devices | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 24, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |