USPTO serial 90861402
SIMPLE PROVEN PERMANENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPLE PROVEN PERMANENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian C. Kunzler
Brian C. Kunzler KUNZLER BEAN & ADAMSON50 W. BROADWAY, 10TH FLOORSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand Tools for sump leak repair, namely Caulk Guns, Material Dispensing Tools, Pneumatic Dispensing Tools for Tube Products, Manual Dispensing Tools for Cartridge Products, Hole Saw Blade and Arbor Kits, Flexible Hand Drivers for Screws, Nuts, and Band Clamps, and Pneumatic Reversible Nut/Screw Drivers | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2020 |
| 017 | Bonded Fitting Kits comprised of Flexible tubes of plastic, Flange Fitting Kits comprised of Flexible hoses, not of metal; Encapsulation Fitting Kits comprised of Flexible tubes of plastic; Housing Fitting Kits comprised of Sump Cuff Fittings, namely Pipe gaskets, Test Reducer Fittings, namely Reducing Inserts, namely Plug Inserts, namely Centralizers/Dam Stops, and Duct Seals, and Caps; Test Reducer Fittings, namely Reducing Inserts, namely Centralizers/Dam Stops, and Duct Seals; Watertight Sump Repair Lids | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |