USPTO serial 90862186
ANTTAINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANTTAINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARFIELD GOODRUM
GARFIELD GOODRUM GARFIELD GOODRUM, DESIGN LAW7 ALLEN STREET, SUITE 302HANOVER, NH 03755UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Containers of metal for storage and transport of cryptocurrency mining hardware machines; Metallic containers for shipping; Metal containers for transport; Storage containers of metal; Buildings, transportable, of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Non-metal containers and metal transportable buildings specifically adapted for the hosting, installation and operation of cryptocurrency mining computer hardware machines; Computer hardware for data mining and cryptocurrency mining; computer peripheral devices; Cryptocurrency hardware wallets; electricity conduits; Metal containers and metal transportable buildings specifically adapted for the hosting, installation and operation of cryptocurrency mining machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2023 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 2023 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2022 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 9, 2022 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 9, 2022 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |