USPTO serial 90870969
MOBI GARDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOBI GARDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Quzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yong Chen
YONG CHEN LIU, CHEN & HOFFMAN LLP40 QUEENS STREET, PO BOX 695SYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lamps; Barbecue grills; Brackets for gas burners; Cooking stoves; Electric fans; Electric griddles; Electric kettles; Electric lamps; Electric roasters; Folding portable charcoal, propane and gas fired barbecues, stoves, and grills; Gas burners; Light bulbs; Lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations; Lights for vehicles; Portable electric fans; Portable utility lights; Roasting spits for cooking ovens; Structural framework sold as parts of ovens; Structural metal framework sold as parts of ovens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |