USPTO serial 90872076
CLIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stouffville, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seong-Cheol Son
Seong-Cheol Son VOYER LAW134 ABBOTT STREET, SUITE 403VANCOUVER, BC, V6B2K4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for online dating; Downloadable software for social networking; Downloadable software for facilitating gathering of friends; Downloadable software for the introduction of individuals with common interests; Downloadable software for developing friendships; Downloadable instant messaging software; Downloadable messaging software for electronically exchanging text messages, photographs, graphics, music, audio files, and voice messages | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic mail services through wireless digital messaging services; Instant messaging services; Group instant messasging services; Group instant messaging services between individuals with common interests | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for online dating; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for social networking; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for facilitating gathering of friends; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for the introduction of individuals with common interests; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for developing friendships | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Services providing information to facilitate gathering of individuals with common interests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |