USPTO serial 90875539
BREEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Culver City, CA, US
Culver City, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD B. BIAGI
RICHARD B. BIAGI NEAL & MCDEVITT, LLC2801 LAKESIDE DRIVESUITE 201BANNOCKBURN, IL 60015Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | General purpose tin containers; General purpose tin containers bearing cannabis-themed designs; the aforementioned goods not for use with cannabis products having a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2021 |
| 016 | Merchandise bags; Merchandise bags bearing cannabis-themed designs; Plastic or paper pouches for merchandise packaging; Plastic or paper pouches for merchandise packaging bearing cannabis-themed designs; the aforementioned goods not for use with cannabis products having a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 2021 |
| 021 | Candy boxes; Candy boxes bearing cannabis-themed designs; Spray bottles sold empty; Spray bottles sold empty bearing cannabis-themed designs; the aforementioned goods not for use with cannabis products having a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |