USPTO serial 90875797
BLUETAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUETAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mahsa Hakimi
MAHSA HAKIMI HAKIMI LAW PC916 KEARNY STREET916 KEARNY STREET, SUITE 604SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Arranging finance for construction projects; Arranging of loans; Bill payment services; Bill payment services provided through a website; Bill payment services provided via an electronic wallet; Charge card and credit card payment processing services; Consumer lending services; Credit card authorization services; Credit card payment processing services; Credit card transaction processing services; Credit card transaction processing services provided via via mobile applications and website; Credit and cash card payment processing services; Credit and loan services; Debit card transaction processing services; Debit card transaction processing services provided via via mobile applications and website; Electronic commerce payment services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; Electronic credit card transaction processing; Electronic debit card transaction processing; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale; Financing services; Financing and loan services; Fraud reimbursement services in the field of credit card purchases; Issuing credit cards; Issuing of credit cards; Issuing of debit cards; Payment processing services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services; Processing of credit card payments; Processing of debit card payments; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments; Trade credit services, namely, financing services and lines of credit for business customers; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network | PARTIALLY PAID | Jun 8, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2022 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2022 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |