USPTO serial 90876049
THRIVE | COWORKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEISECKI, MARK A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THRIVE | COWORKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dayna Thomas, Esq.
Dayna Thomas, Esq. THE LAW OFFICE OF DAYNA THOMAS, LLC531 Roselane Street NW, Suite 400-201Marietta, GA 30060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Incubation services, namely, providing work space containing business equipment to freelancers, start-ups, existing businesses and non-profits; Providing facilities for business meetings; Business administration assistance; Bookkeeping; Advertising and marketing services provided by means of indirect methods of marketing communications, namely, social media, search engine marketing, inquiry marketing, internet marketing, mobile marketing, blogging and other forms of passive, sharable or viral communications channels; Mail sorting, handling and receiving; Administration of business payroll for others; Online retail store services featuring desk chairs, white boards, file cabinets, artificial plants, rugs, headphones, microphones, wall calendars, computer stands, tables, chairs, wireless chargers, and tv wall mount kits; none of the foregoing including real estate services | ACTIVE | Jul 2, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |