USPTO serial 90876962
LINHAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 694
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINHAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Quanzhou, Fujian, CN
Quanzhou, Fujian, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
zhang, weibo
zhang, weibo law office of zhang & associates pc136-68 roosevelt ave, Suite 717flushing, NY 11354UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | 3D printing pens; Chainsaws; Cemented carbide cutting tools; Clothes washing machines; Dishwashers for household purposes; Electric coffee grinders; Electric food choppers; Electric meat grinders; Electric power generators for emergency use; Electric sweepers; Electric welding machines; Electric window cleaning machines; Electrical drills; Engraving machines; Floor cleaning machines; Mixing machines; Packaging machines; Paint spray guns; Vacuum packaging machines | ACTIVE | Jul 22, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | ISCO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |