USPTO serial 90877625
EXPLORERS INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OWCZARSKI, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXPLORERS INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah M. Matz
SARAH M. MATZ ADELMAN MATZ P.C.1173A SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 153NEW YORK, NY 10065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Construction toys; Construction toys (with glowing features); Toy construction blocks and connecting links therefor; Toy construction blocks and connecting links therefor (with glowing features); Toy construction kits; Games and playthings, namely,; kits comprising construction toy building elements, all for designing, building and controlling motorized and robotic toys; Educational toy kits for building motorized and robotic toys, being comprised of toy construction building elements, programmable on-board electronic controls for the toy construction building elements, electric motors for toys; Construction toy sets and carrying cases or storage cases sold as a unit; Arcade video game machines; Backgammon games; Balls for games; Board games; Card games; Chess games; Children's wire construction and art activity toys; Counters and marbles for games; Doll houses; Dolls; Dolls' feeding bottles; Dolls' rooms; Game apparatus, namely, bases, bats, and balls for playing indoor and outdoor games; Jigsaw puzzles; Marbles for games; Play balloons; Play balls; Playing cards; Plush toys; Stuffed and plush toys; Stuffed toys; Tossing disc toys; Toy building blocks; Toy figures; Toy masks; Toy mobiles; Toy models; Toy vehicles; Toys for domestic pets; Trading card games; Video game machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |