USPTO serial 90886952
STABROEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, MACKENZIE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STABROEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Principe
David L. Principe PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP125 MAIN STREETONE CANALSIDEBUFFALO, NY 14203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable computer software for grocery stores to conduct and manage online sales of groceries and consumer merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services featuring groceries and consumer goods; provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | parcel shipping services; merchandise packaging services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software as a service featuring software for grocery stores to conduct and manage online sales of groceries and consumer merchandise; website hosting services; computer technology support services, namely, help desk services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |