USPTO serial 90887501
WINIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gwangsan-gu, Gwangju,, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane J. Mason
Diane J. Mason FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CENTER, 27TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Refrigerators, cooling apparatus and freezers for medical storage purposes; freezers; walk-in freezers; freezer cabinets; deep freezers; refrigerator-freezers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 23, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |