USPTO serial 90889831
KEITH MILTON RHINEHART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KEITH MILTON RHINEHART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hank Fasthoff
Hank Fasthoff FASTHOFF LAW FIRM PLLC21 WATERWAY AVE., SUITE 300THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Religious and spiritual services, namely, providing gatherings to develop and enhance the spiritual lives of individuals; Providing religious counseling services | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1973 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 6, 2022 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2021 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | RSHG | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING - GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | TRMS | TEAS REQUEST TO MAKE SPECIAL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |