Drawing for MOD MOD SÉLECTION CHAMPAGNE 1892

USPTO serial 90891498

MOD MOD SÉLECTION CHAMPAGNE 1892

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNER, CHRISTIAN LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - AWAITING RESPONSE DOCKET

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOD MOD SÉLECTION CHAMPAGNE 1892?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark H. Tidman

Mark H. Tidman Baker & Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington Square, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20036-5403

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ChampagneACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 4, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 22, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 21, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 4, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 11, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2023WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2023WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 8, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 27, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 18, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 14, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2021MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance